For the GRC analyst or control owner who has to answer "which control is this"

Place a control. See the nearest control in every other regime.

Control Mapping Reader places a control statement, a policy clause or an audit finding against the held text of the regimes you answer to, and shows the nearest held control in the others. Paste the text, or photograph the page. It names the regime and the control, shows whether each row is a reviewed pair or a nearest-text match, and gives the auditor evidence commonly asked for. The statement and the photograph are read in your browser: nothing is uploaded while you identify, and nothing leaves until you save.

Place your ownNo account to place a control.

Paste the control text, or photograph the page. A control code, a clause or a finding written in an auditor's words all work. The text is read in your browser; the image never leaves it.
You get the regime and the control, with a confidence. An explicit control code names the control outright; otherwise the closest held text is chosen and marked as assumed, worded as a question.
You get the nearest control in each other regime. Each row says whether it is a reviewed pair or a nearest-text match, its direction and how many rows sit in that regime, and the words the two controls share.
It never rules on you. It places an artifact and shows what the held text supports; whether your control is implemented, or your organisation meets anything, is the assessor's call.

Specimen, already runa trust services control statement

CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets

SOC 2 placed from the control code confidence high

HIPAA Security Rule 164.312(d) nearest text17 rows

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 NIST800-IA-2 nearest text30 rows

Reviewed pair held with ISO 27001:2022, 57.4% covered. A nearest-text row is not a reviewed row.

A compliance analyst reviewing documents at an office desk, hands and paperwork in focus — Answer the questionnaire line, the audit finding and the board question from one placed control, with the nearest controls in every other regime beside it. It works from the copy of the clause you already hold, in your browser, with no consultancy invoice and no re-reading two standards side by side.

Paste a clause, or photograph the page

A control statement, a vendor policy line, a customer's questionnaire item, or a finding written in an auditor's words. One artifact, or a pasted column to place several at once.

Place it against the held text

The held text is read clause by clause. An explicit code places the control outright. Otherwise the closest held text is chosen, marked assumed, and worded as a question you confirm.

Carry it to the answer

The nearest control in each other regime, the auditor evidence for the control, and a clean matrix row you copy or download and drop into the workpaper, the questionnaire or the board paper.

Paste the control statement, the clause, the finding or the questionnaire line. A control code, a heading, or prose all work. A blank line between statements places several at once.

Photograph or screenshot the page Nothing is sent anywhere until you save.

Why place the artifact you hold, and not run a scanner

The question a compliance analyst answers every week is not about packets. It is: which framework and which control does this clause or this finding belong to, and what does it line up with in the regimes I also answer to. The answer sits in the copy of the clause you already hold and the held text of the standards. That is what this reads, in your browser, one artifact at a time, and it says plainly which rows are reviewed and which are only the nearest held text.

The regimes and the reviewed pairs are published in full: the controls held in each regime, the reviewed crosswalk pairs, the control mapping template and where the text comes from. It places the artifact only; a placement names the regime and the control and says what it shares, never a ruling on a person or an organisation.